Evidence, not a transcript
Each accepted run promotes to a review packet you read like a pull request: what changed, why, which call touched which file, and what it cost.
Most agentic tools leave you with a patch and a transcript, a long chat you scroll back through and largely take on faith. deadreckon promotes every accepted run into something you can actually review, the way you would review a pull request.
The review packet is plain files in the library:
RUN-NARRATIVE.md: what happened, in readable prose.RUN-DECISIONS.md: the decision ledger of choices, deviations, tradeoffs, and open questions.RUN-AS-BUILT.md: the shape of the subsystem after the run.provenance.jsonl: every changed file linked back to the turn, tool call, and model that produced it.manifest.json: what was built, and from what.
Because provenance ties each file to the exact call that touched it, you are
never guessing why a line changed. The whole run is auditable on disk, and
attach --view narrative shows the same story live while the run is
still going.
source